Score: 0

"And the pot is calling the kettle what?"

submission: The LaBlueGirl Collection

date: January 14, 2005

I don't even know what La Blue Girl *is*, but the blamming is for obvious reasons. You spent 20 minutes making this, you say. You evidently didn't factor in the time it took you to write your tirade. Divide that into the 5.20 you undoubtedly make an hour, and that's a serious dip into your Pokemon fund, man. Some of us post our animations on Newgrounds because animation IS what we do for a living. We also do it to learn and practice. And then there are idiots who, like so many before, post simply to piss someone off (or so they say) like the disgruntled blam victims they are. Get a life. And, no, I would not like to supersize my order.

Score: 3

"Not funny."

submission: Tsunami Loot-up

date: January 9, 2005

To the reviewer who snapped at us Americans, chill out. Not every American is making, much less *enjoying* games based on an international tragedy!

As for the game...well...not only is it completely offensive and inappropriate, but the graphics are terrible and the interactivity is virtually nothing, unless I just didn't understand the game. I guess I can't wag my finger completely, considering my own morbid curiousity drove me to even play it, but jeeze, man. People lost their lives and families. Where's your head? Don't answer that.

Score: 7

"Needs Attention To Audio"

submission: Something wierd

date: December 31, 2004

Your drawing style rocks! Unfortunately, I could barely understand the audio, much less the story of your movie.

Score: 9

"Great Effort!"

submission: Carl Spacedew

date: December 29, 2004

This was cute! I kept wishing for more of a punchline, but on the whole, it was well done. Animation was great. As for gravity on the moon (does it say anywhere that he's actually on the moon?!), I think your previous critics are taking those details a little too seriously. ;-)

Score: 4

"Needs work, but it's getting there."

submission: Backstage in a pet shop

date: December 18, 2004

While effective in producing an emotional response (now I want to go out and rescue all the bunnies in the world, dang it!), the animation was lacking. Actually, there wasn't much animation...just a collection of still frames. That technique can sometimes be pulled off, but usually with some kind of a transition between scenes. It's a little strange when POOF! There's a truck. POOF! There's a man in the back of the truck. POOF! There's a bunny standing up. POOF! Now he's lying down. There's something almost Atari-esque in its simplicity. ;-) So I recommend you work on true animation. Frame-by-frame animation would really complement your drawing style.

Score: 9

"Not exactly original, but..."

submission: Rebecca

date: December 16, 2004

Not to preach the same sermon everyone's already preached, but the part with the kid? Not funny. And the rest of it was just the same vulgar humor I see in stick animations all over NG. The animation, however, was *awesome*. Good work!

Score: 0

"Wow. That was...what was that?!"

submission: Kenny Logins Collection

date: October 14, 2004

I don't get it. Am I missing something?

Score: 6

"Eh, it was all right."

submission: KERRY'S_ORDER

date: October 12, 2004

It needed a little help with the sound and graphics, but I don't think it was nearly as bad as some of the other viewers say. It made me chuckle in several places. ...And here's the kicker. I'm a Kerry supporter! HAH!

Score: 5

"Not bad, but needs work."

submission: Super Dude - Episode 1

date: October 11, 2004

The story was great, and your graphics were mediocre. My only real beefs were having to press the buttons just to get through the dialogue, which was occasionally somewhat difficult to understand on account of the flagrant spelling errors. But on the whole, it's a great start!

Score: 10

"Fantastic, but..."

submission: The Edge Of Darkness

date: October 10, 2004

The animation was stunningly beautiful. I'm in complete awe of your talent. The story on the other hand...well... I feel like a moron, here, but the story confused the crap out of me. I understand that people are being hacked to bits in the subway station, and I understand that the main detective's wife was killed (by the same killer or in another crime?)... but the detective and the killer resembled each other so closely that I was wondering if this were perhaps a multiple personalities case rather than simply revenge. I just don't know. On the whole, however, it's absolutely wonderful. Bravo.